Private deliverables are hard to settle fairly
Smart contract audits, private patches, unreleased designs, diligence packets, and internal datasets often cannot be posted to a public chain or shared widely with a counterparty.
Private work. Public settlement.
BlindArbiter settles milestone escrow without exposing the deliverable.
A buyer escrows funds against a natural-language rubric. A seller submits sealed evidence. BlindArbiter produces a redacted verdict, then either releases the escrow or opens a dispute with verifiable onchain receipts.
What is live
Teams need to settle private milestone work without exposing audits, patches, or due diligence files.
BlindArbiter reviews sealed evidence inside a self-hosted Ubuntu operator runtime, emits a redacted verdict, and drives release or dispute without leaking the underlying deliverable to external APIs.
Escrow settlement is live on Ethereum Sepolia, Arkhai is settled on Sepolia, and receipts are anchored on Status.
The blind review worker is a self-hosted OpenClaw agent running in a secure Ubuntu operator environment. Sensitive deliverables stay inside that runtime and are evaluated deterministically without being sent to external APIs.
Smart contract audits, private patches, unreleased designs, diligence packets, and internal datasets often cannot be posted to a public chain or shared widely with a counterparty.
The blind review worker is a self-hosted autonomous AI agent running in a secure Ubuntu operator environment via OpenClaw. Sealed deliverables are evaluated deterministically inside that runtime, so sensitive artifacts never need to leave the operator environment or be shipped to third-party APIs.
The buyer and seller see the same public consequences, while the sealed review stays inside the operator runtime.
A milestone is funded against a natural-language acceptance rubric instead of an informal chat agreement.
The seller uploads a private artifact bundle and narrative without exposing the deliverable to the counterparty.
A self-hosted OpenClaw agent running in a secure Ubuntu operator environment scores the sealed submission deterministically.
BlindArbiter writes a public verdict summary, report hash, and receipt trail without leaking the sensitive artifact.
The milestone is released or disputed onchain, while Status receipts anchor the public consequences.
Real deployments and real transaction traces used by the current demo.
0x89cf6d586902b8750e6d6e5158c51e838cae7aa0
0x8942F989343e4Ce8e4c8c0D7C648a6953ff3A5A2
3/21/2026, 1:46:06 PM
0.0002 ETH
released
3/22/2026, 5:19:04 PM
0x8942F989343e4Ce8e4c8c0D7C648a6953ff3A5A2
0x69449340611aE2D705E5CF6f1109E210c4f7b2d3
0x8942F989343e4Ce8e4c8c0D7C648a6953ff3A5A2
buyer and seller are distinct wallets
0x7dcb3e401d6b849ac2bde9f989348ee0fa80e76d19ab1a8dabf57b6ef2ac9502
0xa6d957eff3f9afcdf9689e4896b407292f73a7a32274be11ffe0078c26141da8
0x6d67cf8ba5857425bed0d2b214e0ce2814f7db07
4
This is the reference BlindArbiter flow shown in the demo and backed by the live proof above.
$123
release
Verifier Team
Verified Seller
Release escrow only when the sealed patch narrative explains the access fix, test evidence, and secret handling.
The private patch explains how privileged functions are protected after the patch, documents test execution evidence, and confirms secrets remain sealed during review.
All private acceptance signals aligned with the milestone rubric.
Matched 24 relevant signals inside the private narrative.
The public site cannot show the sealed work itself, so it shows the chain of consequences instead.
The canonical case reached a released state on Ethereum Sepolia after the verdict was posted.
Verdict and settlement actions are published as receipts instead of exposing the private deliverable.
A live natural-language agreement was created, fulfilled, arbitrated, and collected on Sepolia.
The public proof shows hashes, verdicts, and txs while the deliverable remains private.
Illustrative failed milestone: the sealed work stayed private, but the rubric was not satisfied and the dispute path was triggered.
$500
dispute
Security Council
Private patch contributor
Release only if the sealed patch bundle documents test execution evidence, rollback notes, and access-control coverage for the proposed fix.
Seller submitted a sealed patch bundle for an authorization fix with a narrative summary, but omitted reproducible evidence for executed tests and did not document rollback verification.
The private patch explains the code change, but the sealed submission failed to document test execution evidence and rollback verification. BlindArbiter therefore withheld release and triggered the dispute path.
The sealed bundle appears to address the requested authorization boundary.
No reproducible proof of executed tests or attested command output was included in the sealed package.
The submission did not document how the private patch could be reverted safely if the milestone failed in production.
The public proof still shows the consequence chain even though the failed milestone remains sealed.
The failed milestone references missing test execution evidence, not the private patch contents themselves.
BlindArbiter can post both a verdict receipt and a dispute receipt on Status, giving the failed path the same auditability as a release.
The OpenClaw worker runs in the operator secure Ubuntu environment, so the failed submission never needs to leave that boundary.
Clone the repo, deploy the escrow contracts, and keep sealed review inside your own Ubuntu and OpenClaw runtime while preserving the same public receipt trail.